I tried ReadyBoost when it debuted in Vista and I was not impressed. I ran it on my Dell XPS420 (Q6600, 4Gb, DDR2)with Vista home premium. for at least two weeks. I also tried it on Visat x64 on a Dell Studio XPS 435MT(i7 920, 6Gb DDR3) I used a 4Gb in both cases, in fact I used the same PNY Attache 4Gb USB stick. Then Windows 7 came out and microsoft claimed it had had made changes to ReadyBoost.
On the face of it there does appear to be changes. In Vista you could use a flash memory device up to 4Gb, and you could only have one ReadyBoost device. In Windows 7 you can use up to 8Gb and more than one flash memory device. The real difference is how the ReadyBoost has changed between Vista and Windows 7.
So I first tried the ReadyBoost on a new machine I bought for my wife. It is a Hewlett Packard Touchsmart (300-1003)(AMD 235e, 4Gb DDR3) which came with Windows 7 Home Premium. I did not notice any immediate difference after configuring the USB flash drive. So I was kind of disappointed but I left it running on the computer. A couple of days later my wife stated that the computer was firing up faster and running smoother switching programs. I gave it a try and it indeed was faster, though the reality is it was only slightly faster. Startup was 28 seconds faster and switching programs appeared to be faster but I had not tested program switching. I did not expect to great of change as this computer had a decent memory size and speed.
The next victim was a E-Machines netbook an EM250-1162 that I had bought at Wal-Mart. It came with 1Gb of DDR2. Instaed of a USB stick(my wife won't give the USB stick back) I chose to use a SD (Secure Digital) card. It is an ADATA SDHC 8Gb class 6. This machine definitely was borderline with the factory memory configuration. The EM250 comes with a built in multi card slot. I did try some USB sticks in this netbook (by the way I am typing this article on the EM250) I tested the different USB sticks and SD cards with HD Tune. Some of then USB sticks were slightly faster than the cards untiul I tested the ADATA. it was near all of the USB sticks except the PNY Attache that the wife won't give back. The real decision to use the ADATA came from convenience. The SD card stays in the netbook without protruding from it. I noticed an immediate difference in startup. it fired up twice as fast as it had. progr4am to program was also slightly faster. I had ordered a 2Gb memory upgrade for this netbook. so when it came in I removed the SD card and installed the memory. With double the memory it fired up much quicker than it had stock, though there waqs still alot of Hard Hisk activity. I added the SD card back in. The netbook fired up faster than the memory alone, but it did not make as much difference in startup as it had with only 1Gb.
Overall I think Windows 7 ReadyBoost is superior to the Vista version. If you have a system with 4Gb or less you may see a difference. If you have 2Gb or less you probably will see a difference. I would not waste my time configuring more than one ReadyBoost drive on any computer. Is it better to use a 4Gb or a 8Gb flash drive? Well I say the decision is up to you and will probably be made by cost.
I did try a 4Gb SD card and did not see any real difference in performance, it was slighly slower but it was also a class 4 card so that could have been the difference. As a footnote, when I need to get onto the internet quick I use the EM250 netbook as it is up and running in less than a minute.
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Sunday, January 23, 2011
It's been a long time
It has been a long time since I last posted here. I will try to start posting here as I had intended when I started it.
New type of memory design:
Double floating gate FET (Field Effect Transistor), so what is it. It is memory that can have two 'states' It can operate as dynamic memory(the type of memory that is used in your home computer, and it can also operate as Static memory(the type of memory used in flash memory, USB thumb drives, SD cards, Compact Flash etc.)
So what does it do?
It can operate as standard memory and when signaled it can store that information into a higher area that is the static memory. This could allow some really different choices as to how it will be used. Example; you want to have your computer run like your cell phone e.g. you push a button and the phone is ready for use. Currently if you want to do this with your computer you have to leave it on. With the double gates the system will send a signal to the memory and it will make a copy of the environment in the static portion of the memory. Then your computer will shut down. when you turn it on again it will POST (Power On Self Test) then send a signal that will return the data from the static to the dynamic state. Nearly instant on! You will not have to wait for the operating system to be written from disc back to main memory. It will take several cycles
(memory cycles) to accomplish this but not nearly as long as waiting on a disc.
Another use would be for power savings. Currently your computer powers all of its memory all of the time even when it is not really needed. The double floating gate memory could be shut down by copying any content to static then wait to be called back up for use. It can be shut down partially and leave some operating.
What will really be interesting is that it can poll each memory type seperately! so it can be used to check main memory against static for errors. This also means it could be used as long term memory. One set of memory chips that may be able to act as the main memory and the storage drive all at once. It is not being proposed as this but think of the savings that could be in cell phone memory! A 16Gb (storage) iPhone with 16Gb of main memory also, but only one set of memory chips not one set for storage and another set for dynamic memory. probably a more likely scenario would be a 16Gb of flash memory for storage and 1Gb of double gate that will store the operating system and provide 1Gb of main memory also. But for now let me dream on!
New type of memory design:
Double floating gate FET (Field Effect Transistor), so what is it. It is memory that can have two 'states' It can operate as dynamic memory(the type of memory that is used in your home computer, and it can also operate as Static memory(the type of memory used in flash memory, USB thumb drives, SD cards, Compact Flash etc.)
So what does it do?
It can operate as standard memory and when signaled it can store that information into a higher area that is the static memory. This could allow some really different choices as to how it will be used. Example; you want to have your computer run like your cell phone e.g. you push a button and the phone is ready for use. Currently if you want to do this with your computer you have to leave it on. With the double gates the system will send a signal to the memory and it will make a copy of the environment in the static portion of the memory. Then your computer will shut down. when you turn it on again it will POST (Power On Self Test) then send a signal that will return the data from the static to the dynamic state. Nearly instant on! You will not have to wait for the operating system to be written from disc back to main memory. It will take several cycles
(memory cycles) to accomplish this but not nearly as long as waiting on a disc.
Another use would be for power savings. Currently your computer powers all of its memory all of the time even when it is not really needed. The double floating gate memory could be shut down by copying any content to static then wait to be called back up for use. It can be shut down partially and leave some operating.
What will really be interesting is that it can poll each memory type seperately! so it can be used to check main memory against static for errors. This also means it could be used as long term memory. One set of memory chips that may be able to act as the main memory and the storage drive all at once. It is not being proposed as this but think of the savings that could be in cell phone memory! A 16Gb (storage) iPhone with 16Gb of main memory also, but only one set of memory chips not one set for storage and another set for dynamic memory. probably a more likely scenario would be a 16Gb of flash memory for storage and 1Gb of double gate that will store the operating system and provide 1Gb of main memory also. But for now let me dream on!
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Well the iPad is here and at least for me it is an anticlimax. It will be faster than an iPhone as it has a 1Ghz processor rather than the 432Mhz in the 3G, or the 600Mhz in the 3GS. There are no specs as to the memory but here is 128Mb in 3G and 256Mb in the 3gs. Most likely it will have at least the 256Mb of the 3GS maybe more. So it is going to be faster than the iPhones. It will be available in 16Gb, 32Gb and 64Gb models. This is plenty of storage for most people, especially as iPhone apps are relatively small. There is no camera at all. It has no external connectors, well the 30 pin Apple connector, but not even a USB.
I think Apple has missed the mark with the iPad. It should have been dropped into the netbook market as it has everything but the camera.
Do not get me wrong there are pluses to the iPad. It will be a lot easier to read on an iPad than an iphone and I use my iPhone to read books. It supports an estimated 140,000 plus applications to date. It will be faster than an iPhone. And I may even buy one as I already have a number of Apps that I really like. If Apple were to ask me what I wanted in an iPad here they are.
A Multitasking Operating System (I believe the OS can multi-task but has been restricted by Apple). The iPad can run only one app at a time, like the iPhone. With the bigger screen it would have been nice to split the screen so more than one app could be used. I kind of agree with Apple restricting background apps, as these can really destroy performance. Many of the problems people have with their computers come from the plethora of items that are set in the background by unscrupulous software producers, but there should have been allowance for the user to run multiple foreground apps. The iPod app will run in the background while an app is being run in the foreground.
A frontside camera as these are very popular in netbooks.
An external connector preferably a USB. this would allow a multitude of options such as keyboards, mice, game controllers and external storage devices such as backup drives and DVD-ROMS. Another option would be Secure Digital (SD cards) for storage only. It would be nice to take the SD card straight to the iPad without having to find the camera connector kit first. You can connect bluetooth keyboards and headphones to the iPad. There are docking connector options for the 30 pin connector for cameras and other accessories.
Currently you have to have a computer to backup the iPad just like an iPhone. This device should be able to operate as a stand alone computing device.
A internal expansion bay for a 1.8" Hard Disk Drive or Solid State Drive. Apple has this technology available in the iPod classics. The music and video lovers would ante up for this upgrade. There are several options in 20Gb to 320Gb drives and Solid State Storage drives are also available in this form factor. The new Toshiba 1.8" 320Gb is fast with a 5400rpm disk rather than the 4200rpm for all previous 1.8" drives.
Maybe we will see some of these upgrades in later models of the iPad, I hope that they will at least be considered. Apple the iPad is a good start but it could have been much more!
Apple how about an iBook, a unit about the size of a paperback novel. Say a 7 inch screen and 16Gb or 32Gb storage. Less than 3/4 inch thick so it will fit into a coat pocket easy. Wireless of course with a set of stereo speakers. A large battery say 8 hours of combined reading and music. What do you say Apple!!!
CCCBOULY
I think Apple has missed the mark with the iPad. It should have been dropped into the netbook market as it has everything but the camera.
Do not get me wrong there are pluses to the iPad. It will be a lot easier to read on an iPad than an iphone and I use my iPhone to read books. It supports an estimated 140,000 plus applications to date. It will be faster than an iPhone. And I may even buy one as I already have a number of Apps that I really like. If Apple were to ask me what I wanted in an iPad here they are.
A Multitasking Operating System (I believe the OS can multi-task but has been restricted by Apple). The iPad can run only one app at a time, like the iPhone. With the bigger screen it would have been nice to split the screen so more than one app could be used. I kind of agree with Apple restricting background apps, as these can really destroy performance. Many of the problems people have with their computers come from the plethora of items that are set in the background by unscrupulous software producers, but there should have been allowance for the user to run multiple foreground apps. The iPod app will run in the background while an app is being run in the foreground.
A frontside camera as these are very popular in netbooks.
An external connector preferably a USB. this would allow a multitude of options such as keyboards, mice, game controllers and external storage devices such as backup drives and DVD-ROMS. Another option would be Secure Digital (SD cards) for storage only. It would be nice to take the SD card straight to the iPad without having to find the camera connector kit first. You can connect bluetooth keyboards and headphones to the iPad. There are docking connector options for the 30 pin connector for cameras and other accessories.
Currently you have to have a computer to backup the iPad just like an iPhone. This device should be able to operate as a stand alone computing device.
A internal expansion bay for a 1.8" Hard Disk Drive or Solid State Drive. Apple has this technology available in the iPod classics. The music and video lovers would ante up for this upgrade. There are several options in 20Gb to 320Gb drives and Solid State Storage drives are also available in this form factor. The new Toshiba 1.8" 320Gb is fast with a 5400rpm disk rather than the 4200rpm for all previous 1.8" drives.
Maybe we will see some of these upgrades in later models of the iPad, I hope that they will at least be considered. Apple the iPad is a good start but it could have been much more!
Apple how about an iBook, a unit about the size of a paperback novel. Say a 7 inch screen and 16Gb or 32Gb storage. Less than 3/4 inch thick so it will fit into a coat pocket easy. Wireless of course with a set of stereo speakers. A large battery say 8 hours of combined reading and music. What do you say Apple!!!
CCCBOULY
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)